Re: South Com FIRE-6

Posted by Joann on June 21, 2000 at 18:26:42:

In Reply to: Re: South Com FIRE-6 posted by zach on March 18, 2000 at 14:07:06:

: : : Has anyone else noticed that both Federal Way FD and SeaTac FDs have been being dispatched to FIRE-6 (30704) lately? Does anyone know why this is? Does anyone know if FIRE-6 has a VHF patch like the others? Thanks.

: : : zach
: : : zach770@hotmail.com

: : Weird. FW used to dispatch on Fire-8 and SeaTac on Fire-5, didn't they? So now is North Highline alone on Fire-5?

: : Kinda off this topic, but kinda related: isn't Valley Comm supposed to be taking over South Comm sometime soon? When is this happening? Or is it happening at all?

: FW, SeaTac, and North Highline have NOT changed dispatch channels, just response channels. I think there was some confusion there. They are all responding on FIRE-6 now.
: I dont know about any take-over, though.

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup

Name:

E-Mail:

Subject:

Comments:
: : : : : Has anyone else noticed that both Federal Way FD and SeaTac FDs have been being dispatched to FIRE-6 (30704) lately? Does anyone know why this is? Does anyone know if FIRE-6 has a VHF patch like the others? Thanks. : : : : zach : : : : zach770@hotmail.com : : : Weird. FW used to dispatch on Fire-8 and SeaTac on Fire-5, didn't they? So now is North Highline alone on Fire-5? : : : Kinda off this topic, but kinda related: isn't Valley Comm supposed to be taking over South Comm sometime soon? When is this happening? Or is it happening at all? : : FW, SeaTac, and North Highline have NOT changed dispatch channels, just response channels. I think there was some confusion there. They are all responding on FIRE-6 now. : : I dont know about any take-over, though.

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ INTERCEPT WWW BBS ]