Re: South Com FIRE-6

Posted by zach on March 18, 2000 at 14:07:06:

In Reply to: Re: South Com FIRE-6 posted by Bryce on March 18, 2000 at 11:25:52:

: : Has anyone else noticed that both Federal Way FD and SeaTac FDs have been being dispatched to FIRE-6 (30704) lately? Does anyone know why this is? Does anyone know if FIRE-6 has a VHF patch like the others? Thanks.

: : zach
: : zach770@hotmail.com

: Weird. FW used to dispatch on Fire-8 and SeaTac on Fire-5, didn't they? So now is North Highline alone on Fire-5?

: Kinda off this topic, but kinda related: isn't Valley Comm supposed to be taking over South Comm sometime soon? When is this happening? Or is it happening at all?

FW, SeaTac, and North Highline have NOT changed dispatch channels, just response channels. I think there was some confusion there. They are all responding on FIRE-6 now.
I dont know about any take-over, though.

Follow Ups:

Re: South Com FIRE-6 Joann 18:26:42 6/21/100 (0)
Re: South Com FIRE-6 Sean 14:34:31 3/18/100 (2)
- Re: South Com FIRE-6 zach 21:36:53 3/18/100 (1)
  - Re: South Com FIRE-6 preston 00:01:22 4/24/100 (0)

Post a Followup

Name:

E-Mail:

Subject:

Comments:
: : : Has anyone else noticed that both Federal Way FD and SeaTac FDs have been being dispatched to FIRE-6 (30704) lately? Does anyone know why this is? Does anyone know if FIRE-6 has a VHF patch like the others? Thanks. : : : zach : : : zach770@hotmail.com : : Weird. FW used to dispatch on Fire-8 and SeaTac on Fire-5, didn't they? So now is North Highline alone on Fire-5? : : Kinda off this topic, but kinda related: isn't Valley Comm supposed to be taking over South Comm sometime soon? When is this happening? Or is it happening at all? : FW, SeaTac, and North Highline have NOT changed dispatch channels, just response channels. I think there was some confusion there. They are all responding on FIRE-6 now. : I dont know about any take-over, though.

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ INTERCEPT WWW BBS ]