InterceptRadio.com Forums

The radio website where people have a clue.
It is currently Sun Aug 10, 2025 3:00 am

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Forums       Map Search       Database Search       Live Audio       Alerts       Wiki




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 76 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Jan 27, 2008 12:17 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2004 8:57 am
Posts: 755
Location: EL98
OK - so, are the rest of the Clallam County Fire Frequencies staying the same? I'm reworking my Clallam County stuff, and this is what I have so far from the "old" list:

154.220 County Dispatch
154.445 Joyce Dispatch
154.250 Clallam Bay Dispatch
151.925 Olympic AMB
460.100 Pt. Angeles PD
453.300 Sequim PD
453.275 Clallam Co SO

Excluding the "new" frequencies listed earlier in this thread, do the above frequencies look reasonably accurate? Are there new ones to consider (besides the ones earlier in this thread)?

Brad/N7JGX
Whidbey Island, WA

_________________
Whatever.....


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 27, 2008 3:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 3:39 pm
Posts: 63
Location: Port Angeles
looks pretty good T68, i have a text document of all the frequencies for clallam with some jeffco an U.S.C.G as well as state corrections tossed in, if you'd like PM me an i'll e-mail it over to ya, but ur list that u have so far looks pretty good, i have afew more freqs for olympic ambulance and sheriffs dept an p.a pd, and joyce has another freq which is 153.935 (tx), but it all depends on what you want to listen to over here..better yet, PM me an i'll e-mail that doc to ya and you can pick and chose.

_________________
If Prometheus was worthy of the wrath of heaven for kindling the first fire upon earth,
how ought all the gods honor the men who make it their professional business to put it out?
~John Godfrey Saxe


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 27, 2008 12:43 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2004 7:34 pm
Posts: 114
Eric

Dont know if you got my PM. It seems to be stuck in my outbox... dont know if that means its been sent. Anyways, i wouldnt mind taking a look at that list. Could you send it my way?

bcscanner@hotmail.com

Thanks,

Cory

_________________
Cory C.
Vancouver Island Scanner Reference
http://www.members.shaw.ca/bcscanner/


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 27, 2008 6:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 3:39 pm
Posts: 63
Location: Port Angeles
i got your PM bc, i just sent you a copy of it, i know what you mean about your PM being in the oubox i sent 1 out to matt cawby for his list of mil frequencies an havent heard back from him, an those that requested a copy of my frequency list if you didn't get it let me know an i'll try an send it out again..

_________________
If Prometheus was worthy of the wrath of heaven for kindling the first fire upon earth,
how ought all the gods honor the men who make it their professional business to put it out?
~John Godfrey Saxe


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 8:54 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2000 9:20 am
Posts: 2005
A PM remains in the "outbox" until the recipient has read the message. Slightly different concept from email where an "outbox" is a queue between the sending client and the mail server.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 01, 2008 10:22 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2005 12:19 pm
Posts: 58
Location: sequim
i did get the freqs, but between prepping to teach, and teaching CERT/MYN classes and shoveling my driveway, i hadn't time to respond; i do appreciate the data.
bob :D


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 06, 2008 10:09 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2008 10:16 pm
Posts: 12
Eric wrote:
they will be switching and adding frequencies, they should be up by early part of next year, but here is what i have so far


154.1750 Clallam County Fire Dist 3 ( Old Primary / Tac 2 )

151.7750 Clallam County Fire Dist 3

153.7850 Clallam County Fire Dist 3 ( Tac 1 )

154.0100 Clallam County Fire dist 3 ( Primary TX )

154.0325 Clallam County Fire Dist 3 ( Tac 3 RX )

154.3850 Clallam County Fire Dist 3 ( Tac 5 )

154.0335 Clallam County Fire Dist 3 ( Tac 3 TX )

155.7825 Clallam County Fire Dist 3 ( Primary RX )



eric...I'm curious as to where you got the information about this. The only accurate frequency and for what it will be used is the CCFD3 New Primary TX/RX. Some of the other frequencies are correct, but not assigned at this time.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 06, 2008 10:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 3:39 pm
Posts: 63
Location: Port Angeles
radiojoe wrote:
Eric wrote:
they will be switching and adding frequencies, they should be up by early part of next year, but here is what i have so far


154.1750 Clallam County Fire Dist 3 ( Old Primary / Tac 2 )

151.7750 Clallam County Fire Dist 3

153.7850 Clallam County Fire Dist 3 ( Tac 1 )

154.0100 Clallam County Fire dist 3 ( Primary TX )

154.0325 Clallam County Fire Dist 3 ( Tac 3 RX )

154.3850 Clallam County Fire Dist 3 ( Tac 5 )

154.0335 Clallam County Fire Dist 3 ( Tac 3 TX )

155.7825 Clallam County Fire Dist 3 ( Primary RX )



eric...I'm curious as to where you got the information about this. The only accurate frequency and for what it will be used is the CCFD3 New Primary TX/RX. Some of the other frequencies are correct, but not assigned at this time.

that is what i thought i heard, and i took it as the '' gospel truth '' so i stand corrected, going back through my scanner list and the fcc data base i need to correct 154.385 i have it listed as CCFD3 tac it is not even licensed to them that i can find, it is how ever licensed to san juan fire with output power of 5 watts (to me that is a tac freq) & other agencys the only 1 that is licensed to CCFD3 that even has 5 watts is 151.775 <----tac ch??? the other freqs have 50 watts with the exception of 155.7825 that has about 100 watts, so i should be correct on that one as the primary, but shouldn't 154.0100 have the same wattage if it is supposed to be another primary ch?? , cause 154.175 has the same wattage for both fixed base and mobile if you can clear up this list radiojoe i know i and some other folks on here would appreciate it.

_________________
If Prometheus was worthy of the wrath of heaven for kindling the first fire upon earth,
how ought all the gods honor the men who make it their professional business to put it out?
~John Godfrey Saxe


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 07, 2008 7:49 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2008 10:16 pm
Posts: 12
I have not been authorized to give out any information until the project is complete. If the people of this board would like information, they can go to the FCC ULS website like you did and get your information there, and make assumptions as to what it will be used for. Unfortunately at this time, not even I know what all of the other frequencies are going to be used for.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 07, 2008 4:44 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2004 7:34 pm
Posts: 114
The part that confuses me when checking the FCC database, is it lists the frequency 154.0325 as associated with 155.7825 (repeater output). But it is actually 154.0100 which is being used as the input.

_________________
Cory C.
Vancouver Island Scanner Reference
http://www.members.shaw.ca/bcscanner/


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 07, 2008 8:42 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 8:11 pm
Posts: 2151
Location: Puget Sound
Quote:
it lists the frequency 154.0325 as associated with 155.7825 (repeater output). But it is actually 154.0100 which is being used as the input.



Obtaining frequencies is a game of seek and find. You can start the process of obtaining frequencies and a couple of years later finally have the license in hand. By then you may have found other better choices that have since become available. The associated frequencies on any license are not necessarily used as a pair or on the same system. Just look at the State Patrol licenses.

Due to this "game" of "Find Your Frequency", other frequencies that were acquired may or may not ever be used. They should eventually be returned to the "pool" if they are not used.

The channel list for CCFD#3 is not complete. The decisions of channel use have not yet been made although it looks as if the Primary system pair will probably stay. But there is no guarantee.

There are always potential interference issues to look and test for.

Hope that helps! :mrgreen:

_________________
"A well regulated breakfast, being necessary to the healthy start of the day, the right of the people to keep and eat food shall not be infringed."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 08, 2008 7:27 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2004 7:34 pm
Posts: 114
Yes, thank you. I wasnt sure how the licensing thing was done, whether all the info in the FCC database was concrete, or if it was more as how you said. Now I know.

_________________
Cory C.
Vancouver Island Scanner Reference
http://www.members.shaw.ca/bcscanner/


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 11, 2008 8:09 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2008 10:16 pm
Posts: 12
It looks like next tuesday April 15th, Clallam Fire 3 (Sequim) Will be switching from our Simplex system to a Repeated/Voted over IP System around 1900 hrs. We will be looking for input from you folks in scanner land on if you notice any anomolys.

Repeater Input: 154.0100 with a PL 123.0
Repeater Output: 155.7825 with a PL of 123.0

We have 3 repeaters, one is located at Clallam Fire 3 Head Quarters in Sequim, one at the WSP Detachment in Port Angeles, and one in Cape George near Port Townsend.

Please feel free to use this board as a discussion of any issues and one of our radio techs along with myself will be checking it regularly.

Thanks!

Joe 8)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 12, 2008 6:05 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2005 12:19 pm
Posts: 58
Location: sequim
interesting. 1900 is when we do the county ARES net, including a Sequim simplex net from the station, might be crowded in the ECC! i presume that black box on the west wall of the ECC has something to do with the new system.
bob
ke7hzb


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 12, 2008 10:25 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2008 10:16 pm
Posts: 12
That new box in there is actually a replacement radio for our current simplex system. We will be continuing to utilize our current frequency as a tac frequency. We decided that it would be beneficial to have a new radio in case we needed to switch back to simplex if there were problems that came up with the repeated system. There won't be anyone in the radio room though, you probably won't even notice anyone except for myself and a few others when we are reprogramming pagers for the whole district. :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 76 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by electricity. Copyright © 2013 Interceptradio.com