[redshift] wrote:
http://www.thenewstribune.com/2012/03/24/2080250/transportation-budget-loses-items.html
I've read it through twice and still am unsure of what it means. Initially, I thought it meant the Gov. had struck down the money to pay for the WSP radio switch, but now that I've read it through again, it seems as if the Gov. has just struck down money for a review of the switch, removing another roadblock in the way of the upgrade.
Rep. Reuven Carlyle, who apparently has "a background in the wireless communications industry", wanted to delay the project by doing yet another study. He holds that the state should build out its own "open" system instead of saving money by going with proprietary technology on an existing system. Apparently his background didn't give him enough training to understand that we've got 8 months to stop using all the NFM channels. If his study got started tomorrow (wasting even more time and money on this project), we'd be lucky to get an RFP out by the end of the summer. And by the time you've selected a vendor, the NFM deadline would be a few weeks away. Sounds a lot like the "delay to kill" tactic from the politician's handbook.
I'm not entirely convinced this "open system" plan is the best plan. Show me one manufacturer that doesn't add their own features to P25 radios. And even if you do find one, is it really worth it to have 2+ vendors of radios floating around in your system just so you can save $100 per unit on the up-front purchase cost? Yeah I know Motorola radios are pricey, but we're getting a really good deal on the back-end infrastructure. Seems like a no-brainer to piggyback on IWN, but that's just my

with no "background in the wireless communications industry".