InterceptRadio.com Forums

The radio website that puts military & officer safety ahead of profits.
It is currently Mon Jul 28, 2025 12:07 pm

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Forums       Map Search       Database Search       Live Audio       Alerts       Wiki




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: WSP Skykomish
PostPosted: Mon Nov 14, 2011 8:18 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2004 9:34 am
Posts: 345
Can anybody confirm that WSP District 7 in Everett uses 154.775 PL 156.7 in the Skykomish area? I noticed in the Wiki that it is listed as "Shuksan" which is a mountaintop in the Mt Baker area of Whatcom County, yet it's listed in the DB as used for Skykomish area. I did pick up a transmission on that frequency with that tone but was unable to discern the content. I would think the distances involved would make it unlikely that it was from the Mt Baker area due to it not being a repeated frequency.

As a side note...I still hear troopers calling "Skykomish" on the Area frequency.

Any help would be appreciated.

_________________
Richard
Do you know Bunnery?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: WSP Skykomish
PostPosted: Tue Nov 15, 2011 6:04 am 
Offline
Corporal Cowboy
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2004 4:45 pm
Posts: 3556
Location: Stensgar, SE of
154.755- it links Sky with 'Everett'. Sobrieski I believe.
TX is Everett input.
Kind of odd.
If nothing has changed in the last decade since I've been there.

_________________
</>


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: WSP Skykomish
PostPosted: Tue Nov 15, 2011 6:31 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2004 9:34 am
Posts: 345
So kind of like a simulcast of 155.655?

_________________
Richard
Do you know Bunnery?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: WSP Skykomish
PostPosted: Wed Nov 16, 2011 6:00 am 
Offline
Corporal Cowboy
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2004 4:45 pm
Posts: 3556
Location: Stensgar, SE of
Yabut-
Program 154.845 & 154.755 when in Sky.

_________________
</>


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: WSP Skykomish
PostPosted: Wed Nov 16, 2011 1:23 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Oct 03, 2010 9:00 am
Posts: 75
Their site should still be at Sobieski Mountain also known as Maloney Ridge.
And I think they are still using the old system of receivers that come out of different speakers on their dispatch consoles.
What happens is when things get busy, they turn down a couple of the more distant RX's because units in Seattle for example don't hear car to car traffic up at Hyak or Sky and vice versa.
That is why you hear mobiles calling saying the RX they are coming on to get the dispatchers attention.
That was common for me when I was J-301 on the passes.
We would select the correct frequency for different receivers, and OFTEN have to call several times to get the dispatchers attention.
Hence the " Jay three zero one Seattle on Rattlesnake " type of calls.
It has gotten worse now that Z5 shares the Z1 channel.
The dispatchers just turn on ALL the transmitters, (Which are not simulcast disciplined unless that was done recently ) so traffic on Snoqualmie is mostly unreadable. Just sounds like multiple units "doubling" with each other.
Sounds like they are about to spend a LOT of money to go to P25 VHF and FINALLY simulcast and vote RX's.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: WSP Skykomish
PostPosted: Wed Nov 16, 2011 7:14 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2004 9:34 am
Posts: 345
Thanks guys I appreciate the answers.

_________________
Richard
Do you know Bunnery?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: WSP Skykomish
PostPosted: Thu Nov 17, 2011 12:07 am 
Offline
Corporal Cowboy
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2004 4:45 pm
Posts: 3556
Location: Stensgar, SE of
Side note;
Sobieski is only snow free a few months. One can view the old railroad grade switchbacks across the valley to the north & east, and catch a glimpse of the Sound to the west.

_________________
</>


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: WSP Skykomish
PostPosted: Sat Nov 26, 2011 10:27 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Oct 03, 2010 9:00 am
Posts: 75
I asked recently what the WSP plan is supposed to be. ( within weeks )
Looks like P25 VHF conventional is the answer.
Any body hear a definitive answer that is different?
That would sure make the most sense given the coverage they have now with the sites they have.
But, I once in a while hear people that think WSP is going 700/800.
That would cost a LOT more money.
Its going to be an interesting next couple years.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: WSP Skykomish
PostPosted: Sun Nov 27, 2011 7:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2004 11:18 am
Posts: 1389
Location: Not Biloxi
They are partnering with IWN.

_________________
I generate Board Warnings


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: WSP Skykomish
PostPosted: Sun Nov 27, 2011 1:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2007 1:58 pm
Posts: 3429
Location: Not in Alaska
I don't think there are any 800 pairs available on this side of the mountains.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: WSP Skykomish
PostPosted: Sun Nov 27, 2011 4:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2004 11:18 am
Posts: 1389
Location: Not Biloxi
It will be VHF only at this point from everything I've read.

_________________
I generate Board Warnings


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: WSP Skykomish
PostPosted: Wed Nov 30, 2011 6:42 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Oct 03, 2010 9:00 am
Posts: 75
Ok, the latest I hear is they are going VHF P25 conventional on their system.
AND they are negotiating to have some units on other agency systems.
On the DOJ system if they can get on.
And likely on the various 800/700 trunking systems in those areas, if they can get on.
All that makes WAY too much sense.
Now, I wonder if KC/VC, Seattle or Sno County would let them have units on their system?
It would seem like a good idea to put the Seattle/Tacoma/Everett Zones on a TG of their own for dispatch.
Add just that second radio ( or the multiband ) for those troops.
But stick with VHF for most of the state.
I wonder if the fed systems have the capacity that they would allow a lot of WSP units on.
This will be interesting.
Ya' sure don't want to see WSP wind up with the very expensive multi-band-multi-brand systtem that CHP is getting.
Having other agencies on as "subscribers" make way more sense to me the excessive duplication that is going on now.
It is going to be an interesting next few years.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by electricity. Copyright © 2013 Interceptradio.com