| InterceptRadio.com Forums http://interceptradio.com/bbs/ |
|
| 467.6625 http://interceptradio.com/bbs/viewtopic.php?f=26&t=3685 |
Page 1 of 2 |
| Author: | Mark [ Sun Jan 03, 2010 3:10 pm ] |
| Post subject: | 467.6625 |
Some weird digital stuff. not P25 On and off, mostly off, for days |
|
| Author: | the Outlaw [ Sun Jan 03, 2010 3:53 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 467.6625 |
Isn't that a FRS freq? |
|
| Author: | Jim [ Sun Jan 03, 2010 3:57 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 467.6625 |
Sure is (CH12) FRS |
|
| Author: | Mark [ Sun Jan 03, 2010 4:05 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 467.6625 |
I don't think it's local, but very strong. Canada? I know they use FRS too. |
|
| Author: | Jim [ Sun Jan 03, 2010 4:09 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 467.6625 |
Let us know when it comes on again and I will try to hear it from here. |
|
| Author: | Mark [ Wed Jan 06, 2010 10:01 pm ] | ||
| Post subject: | Re: 467.6625 | ||
active starting about 10 ago
|
|||
| Author: | Jim [ Wed Jan 06, 2010 10:08 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 467.6625 |
I hear nothing on that frequency here. Very interesting audio. Data of some sort. :shock: |
|
| Author: | chpalmer [ Wed Jan 06, 2010 10:24 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 467.6625 |
How strong Mark? |
|
| Author: | Mark [ Wed Jan 06, 2010 10:28 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 467.6625 |
strong. I have forgotten to try another receiver to see if it’s the 780, which I doubt. |
|
| Author: | Rich [ Wed Jan 06, 2010 10:36 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 467.6625 |
Mark wrote: active starting about 10 ago POCSAG 2400 Try running POCFLEX on it. |
|
| Author: | Mark [ Wed Jan 06, 2010 10:39 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 467.6625 |
I will dig out the data slicer tomorrow. As usual Rich, you are the man! -m |
|
| Author: | Rich [ Wed Jan 06, 2010 10:43 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 467.6625 |
Make your life easy. Use PDW110 with the soundcard input. |
|
| Author: | SpudGunMan [ Thu Jan 07, 2010 12:36 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 467.6625 |
sounds too fast for POCSAG assume its post discriminator but that sharp peek on the data burst will corrupt any decoding that is there. what about Ethernet RFI? that's what it sounded like to me. also if you have never seen this gem http://www.kb9ukd.com/digital/ |
|
| Author: | Rich [ Thu Jan 07, 2010 12:59 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 467.6625 |
SpudGunMan wrote: sounds too fast for POCSAG POCSAG 2400 sounds faster than POCSAG 512 for obvious reasons. Or are you saying that it sounds faster than POCSAG 2400 ? Using the site you suggested: http://www.kb9ukd.com/digital/pocsag24.wav How do the sounds compare ? |
|
| Author: | SpudGunMan [ Thu Jan 07, 2010 1:45 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 467.6625 |
I thought it was too fast for 2400, but I also had this sharp overdriven RF on the frame tone. in VLC I heard a almost constant ping ping ping that was overdrive more RFI after you post I ran it in WMP out of cuerosity and things sound better there for sure! (more like pocsag) I assume its how VLC is play a mp4 file on my computer incorrectly.. edit/my VLC seems to play MP4 2x as fast as a normal mp3 |
|
| Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC - 8 hours |
| Copyright © 2013 Interceptradio.com |
|