InterceptRadio.com Forums

The radio website that puts military & officer safety ahead of profits.
It is currently Thu Aug 07, 2025 9:38 am

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Forums       Map Search       Database Search       Live Audio       Alerts       Wiki




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: fire department changes
PostPosted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 5:52 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 5:30 pm
Posts: 406
Location: Auburn, WA
Edgewood and Milton are both looking at joining East Pierce. Last I heard last month administrative agreements were signed with East Pierce, which is the beginning of a merger/annexation. Pierce County Fire District #8 will merge into East Pierce while the Pierce County portion of Milton will be annexed into East Pierce and the King County portion of Milton will have to sign a contract for East Pierce to provide services to that area.

Orting Valley Fire and Rescue District 18 is looking for someone to merge with after East Pierce said they could not handle another merger at the same time as the Edgewood/Milton merger/annexation. Orting Valley has approached Graham Fire and Rescue about a merger.

Edmonds Fire Department is looking at whether they are going to keep their own fire department or sign a contract with Snohomish County Fire District #1.

Nick Welch


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 11:47 pm 
Offline
Bringer of Light
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 5:22 pm
Posts: 1573
Location: Depends on the day of the week
I haven't been following the tons of mergers on the west side of the mountains but are they ALL eventually going to merge to a fire authority within each county similar to what they did in Orange County, CA at the rate they're going?

Certain people want Yakima County to do that and get rid of all the fire districts and city departments and go with one fire authority. That's going to take a major communications system overhaul to get the communications side of that accomplished...

_________________
Interoperability is an attitude, not a technology.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 5:51 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 5:30 pm
Posts: 406
Location: Auburn, WA
I don't know about forming a countywide fire authority. Probably not at this time. Maybe ten years from now who knows. I think it is mostly going to be a lot of smaller mergers first.

Nick


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 8:11 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2004 6:37 pm
Posts: 1477
Location: Radio Land
Anytime a government agency 'regroups' -- there can be major problems. However -- the basic radio plan for most "countywide" operations already exist. Back in the early 1950's -- when the VHF High band channels were first "allocated" -- each county within the state was assigned one or more frequencies. The entire State was assigned channels in the form of a checker board pattern -- hop skipping from one county to the next. The most common County Fire channels were 153.77, 153.89, 154.19, 154.25 and 154.43. Each county within the state has an existing license on one of these "common" countywide channels. Any new "countywide" Fire Department, Agency or Authority would be able to operate "from the get-go" on one of the "common" channels. It could be done. From a taxpayers point --as well as a firefighter / EMS provider view -- it must be done. It will save money, jobs and lives.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 8:34 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 5:30 pm
Posts: 406
Location: Auburn, WA
I am all for a regionalized approach to fire/ems. It can work if done properly as evidenced by East Pierce and the Valley Regional Fire Authority.

Nick


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 28, 2009 8:42 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 10:48 am
Posts: 6
Just a clarification...Orting Valley did not approach Graham Fire. Graham Fire was contact by the City of Orting...

Also, there is a special meeting tomorrow night about this very subject...more to follow...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 28, 2009 9:31 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 8:28 pm
Posts: 1864
MTM wrote:
Anytime a government agency 'regroups' -- there can be major problems. However -- the basic radio plan for most "countywide" operations already exist. Back in the early 1950's -- when the VHF High band channels were first "allocated" -- each county within the state was assigned one or more frequencies. The entire State was assigned channels in the form of a checker board pattern -- hop skipping from one county to the next. The most common County Fire channels were 153.77, 153.89, 154.19, 154.25 and 154.43. Each county within the state has an existing license on one of these "common" countywide channels. Any new "countywide" Fire Department, Agency or Authority would be able to operate "from the get-go" on one of the "common" channels. It could be done. From a taxpayers point --as well as a firefighter / EMS provider view -- it must be done. It will save money, jobs and lives.



Why that sounds like inter op, interopra, interoperability. What kind of nonsense is that?

_________________
"I was installing un-programmed radios"


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by electricity. Copyright © 2013 Interceptradio.com