InterceptRadio.com Forums

The radio website that doesn’t molest your screen with advertisements.
It is currently Tue Aug 05, 2025 7:31 am

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Forums       Map Search       Database Search       Live Audio       Alerts       Wiki




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Need an 800mhz antenna
PostPosted: Wed Sep 09, 2009 12:31 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 10:25 am
Posts: 102
Location: Seattle
I'm getting fed up with lousy reception in my car of ValleyCom and all of the other TRS that I like to listen to. I use a PRO-97 and an NMO mount antenna cut to 850, and I find that the reception is as good, if not better, with the rubber duck inside the car! WTF?

I live in Fremont, and it all comes in lousy. Seattle Fire, bad. Eastside, Bad. VC? Bad.

Any suggestions?

_________________
Rob
N7LXI - Seattle


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 09, 2009 1:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2004 2:22 pm
Posts: 520
Location: Boulder, CO
n7lxi wrote:
I'm getting fed up with lousy reception in my car of ValleyCom and all of the other TRS that I like to listen to. I use a PRO-97 and an NMO mount antenna cut to 850, and I find that the reception is as good, if not better, with the rubber duck inside the car! WTF?

I live in Fremont, and it all comes in lousy. Seattle Fire, bad. Eastside, Bad. VC? Bad.

Any suggestions?


The NMO will give you much better reception. So what you said about that, makes sense. A scanner isn't going to give you very good reception inside a car; that is to be expected. Even an MTS2000 will perform better inside a car, if it's connected to a roof antenna.

Are you sure you typed those sentences right? Am I sure I read this right? Cause I know you know better, Rob. :wink:

_________________
I taste copper.
Comments, views, opinions - and trails of destruction - are my own.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 09, 2009 2:35 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 10:25 am
Posts: 102
Location: Seattle
I know, it sounds crazy, but there it is!

The trunk lip mount NMO whip cut for 850 works NO BETTER than the 800Mhz rubber duck I have on the scanner.

bad coax? Bad connector? operator error?

_________________
Rob
N7LXI - Seattle


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 09, 2009 3:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2004 7:10 pm
Posts: 308
Location: Grant County / Moses Lake, Washington
Is the 800mhz antenna a 'no ground plane' ?? We see much better reception on 800mhz LTR with an NMO mount directly in the roof or trunk.

We sell the B8065CN 5db gain antenna. GREAT RESULTS!!

_________________
Spectrum Communications, Inc.
526 S Locust Lane
Moses Lake, WA 98837


- - - - -
Kenwood/Relm-BK/Vertex-Standard/David Clark/USAlert/Swissphone. Serving You Since 1978!
- - - - -
http://www.scml.us
http://www.insp.com

- - - - -


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 09, 2009 3:13 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 8:28 pm
Posts: 1864
I was gonna say check the connector. Does it sound better on VHF with a VHF antenna with the NMO?

_________________
"I was installing un-programmed radios"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 09, 2009 5:55 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2006 7:19 pm
Posts: 44
Location: Edmonds, WA
With the GRE-600 in my car, I have found overload from cell towers to be the most significant factor in receiving the local trunked systems. You are often better off with a less efficient (rather than more efficient) antenna under these circumstances. That may explain why your rubber duck works better than the exterior antenna.

When real close to a cell tower, I have actually gotten a better trunked signal by completely disconnecting the antenna. When someone else told me to try this, I thought that they were nuts, but I tried it, and much to my surprise it worked!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 09, 2009 6:12 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 8:11 pm
Posts: 2151
Location: Puget Sound
Beaconhunter wrote:
With the GRE-600 in my car, I have found overload from cell towers to be the most significant factor in receiving the local trunked systems. You are often better off with a less efficient (rather than more efficient) antenna under these circumstances. That may explain why your rubber duck works better than the exterior antenna.

When real close to a cell tower, I have actually gotten a better trunked signal by completely disconnecting the antenna. When someone else told me to try this, I thought that they were nuts, but I tried it, and much to my surprise it worked!


When you really understand what front end overload is this makes perfect sense...

With all the 800mHz rf the first amplifer in your receiver is kept quite busy. It has no resources left to amplify your wanted signals. Its also amplifying these unwanted signals into your receiver raising the noise floor substantially.

Make sense?

_________________
"A well regulated breakfast, being necessary to the healthy start of the day, the right of the people to keep and eat food shall not be infringed."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 09, 2009 11:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2007 1:58 pm
Posts: 3430
Location: Not in Alaska
n7lxi wrote:
Any suggestions?

Move? I get the Seattle simulcast well, but anything else sucks. Haven't tried to pick up KC/VC from my new place.

Have you tried the Radio Shack 800 antenna? It's actually really really good.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 10, 2009 5:11 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 10:25 am
Posts: 102
Location: Seattle
Taco, the Radio Shack 800 antenna is what I use, but it's still sketchy in spots.

I'm just surprised at how bad I receive all of the TRS stuff with the antenna on the trunk. The car is a lease, so no drilling. I haven't tried the scanner with a VHF antenna yet. This weekend, maybe.

At home, the Seattle Simulcast is listenable, but I work down south. :( I guess I'll just keep messing with it.

Preston, maybe I should try one your antennas.

And I understand the front end overload issues. Damm cell towers! I occasionally get a "hetrodyne" type sound on the scanner. I'm guessing that's caused by cell or something else overloading the front end of the radio, too.

_________________
Rob
N7LXI - Seattle


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 10, 2009 5:24 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2004 3:49 pm
Posts: 60
See the eBay link in the other thread I posted. Those antennas are awesome. Totally bulletproof.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 10, 2009 5:56 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 8:28 pm
Posts: 1864
Okay, if you're getting a hetrodyne or overloading, then probably not too much can be done until rebanding except the antenna swap or possibly hitting the ATT button. I get the same issue in other areas with overloading from cell or Nextel sites on my 197. I wouldn't trade the hot front end though. The rebanding could render the 97 obsolete.

_________________
"I was installing un-programmed radios"


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by electricity. Copyright © 2013 Interceptradio.com