| InterceptRadio.com Forums http://interceptradio.com/bbs/ |
|
| Monitoring WSDOT http://interceptradio.com/bbs/viewtopic.php?f=26&t=3033 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | dog [ Tue Jul 28, 2009 12:51 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Monitoring WSDOT |
I've yet to receive a single transmission on the LTR system. I must have programmed it wrong, I assume they talk at some point on the radio.... Any tips? I have it as type "LTR" with these system freqs, on auto-place: 851.337500 852.087500 854.162500 854.337500 858.212500 859.212500 859.212500 868.087500 868.112500 852.083750 853.058750 853.063750 854.038750 856.021250 860.021250 860.021250 866.003750 866.056250 867.006250 867.013750 868.013750 868.097500 868.098750 |
|
| Author: | N7QOR [ Tue Jul 28, 2009 12:53 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Monitoring WSDOT |
WSDOT is LTR-NET. Will LTR scanners track LTR-NET? |
|
| Author: | Rich [ Tue Jul 28, 2009 1:52 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Monitoring WSDOT |
WSDOT is Multinet-2. They use subaudible data similar to LTR. LTR scanners will not scan them in LTR mode. Best way is to scan all the channels in the site and use audio-based squelch if you have it. |
|
| Author: | 401402 [ Tue Jul 28, 2009 4:50 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Monitoring WSDOT |
psr500 and or pro 106 wont track this? |
|
| Author: | Wilrobnson [ Tue Jul 28, 2009 5:19 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Monitoring WSDOT |
401402 wrote: psr500 and or pro 106 wont track this? Nothing but a WSDOT radio will. |
|
| Author: | icom1020 [ Tue Jul 28, 2009 6:12 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Monitoring WSDOT |
The trick is to scan the home channels only, the ones that don't have the constant status carrier , much like you would if you were monitoring a trunk system conventionally by locking out the control channels. It's a pain but it's the only way so far. However the status channels with the carrier can also carry voice, so one may have to hit manual to listen to the other side of a conversation by going back to a status channel. In a given area there is usually only a few home channels and a status channel. Some of the regions have a VHF link patched mainly in the winter which affiliate parts of the districts to the 800 system. |
|
| Author: | dog [ Tue Jul 28, 2009 8:22 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Monitoring WSDOT |
ok, i added all these freqs as conventional freqs.... we'll see what comes out... |
|
| Author: | charlie fox [ Tue Jul 28, 2009 8:37 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Monitoring WSDOT |
Funny that WSDOT has what seems to be a highly secure net while WSP broadcasts in the clear...not that I'm complaining :lol: |
|
| Author: | Wilrobnson [ Tue Jul 28, 2009 9:00 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Monitoring WSDOT |
charlie fox wrote: Funny that WSDOT has what seems to be a highly secure net while WSP broadcasts in the clear...not that I'm complaining :lol: Not really highly secure, just a weird system. AFAIK, no scanners will track it because there are so few Multinet LTR systems in the first place- not enough interest. FYI: Quote: Emergency Management Radio Systems State Agency Emergency Net (STAEN) - 800 MHz The State Agency Emergency Net is a radio net employing an ultra high frequency (UHF) 800 MHz repeater that has been incorporated into the Washington State Department of Transportation's (WSDOT) 800 MHz trunked radio system on Capitol Peak. The net was primarily designed to provide a capability for state agencies within the Capitol Campus, Tumwater, Lacey, and surrounding areas to communicate with the State Emergency Operations Center (EOC) during emergency situations or disasters which severely impact or restrict the use of "normal" telephone services. It can also be used to communicate among agencies during an emergency situation, as needed. State agencies have been encouraged to procure equipment and participate in the net. Currently, eight agencies have done so. They are: 1. Department of Social and Health Services (DSHS). 2. Department of Agriculture . 3. Department of Community, Trade, and Economic Development (CTED) - Energy Division. 4. Department of Health (DOH). 5. Department of Information Services (DIS). 6. Department of Labor and Industries (L&I). 7. Department of Retirement Systems (DRS). 8. Office of the Governor. 9. Office of the State Auditor. 10. Utilities and Transportation Commission. 11. Employment Security Department. A talk group, primarily consisting of the state agencies, has been defined for the net. The State Emergency Operations Officer (SEOO) monitors the net on a 24- hour basis. Communications checks of the net are scheduled on the first and third Mondays of each month to ensure operational readiness. http://siec.wa.gov/plan/files/SCIP.pdf |
|
| Author: | Vizwar [ Thu Jul 30, 2009 10:19 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Monitoring WSDOT |
charlie fox wrote: Funny that WSDOT has what seems to be a highly secure net while WSP broadcasts in the clear...not that I'm complaining :lol: Sometimes the most 'secure' protocol is an 'obscure' protocol. If it's so rarely used in the industry the scanner manufacturers won't develop a scanner to track it. WSP and WSDOT are both 'in the clear' because they are not encrypted. |
|
| Author: | olowy [ Tue Aug 04, 2009 5:16 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Monitoring WSDOT |
Not enough interest? Who wouldnt want to listen to the Auditor's office or employment security dept? Wilrobnson wrote: charlie fox wrote: Funny that WSDOT has what seems to be a highly secure net while WSP broadcasts in the clear...not that I'm complaining :lol: Not really highly secure, just a weird system. AFAIK, no scanners will track it because there are so few Multinet LTR systems in the first place- not enough interest. FYI: Quote: Emergency Management Radio Systems State Agency Emergency Net (STAEN) - 800 MHz The State Agency Emergency Net is a radio net employing an ultra high frequency (UHF) 800 MHz repeater that has been incorporated into the Washington State Department of Transportation's (WSDOT) 800 MHz trunked radio system on Capitol Peak. The net was primarily designed to provide a capability for state agencies within the Capitol Campus, Tumwater, Lacey, and surrounding areas to communicate with the State Emergency Operations Center (EOC) during emergency situations or disasters which severely impact or restrict the use of "normal" telephone services. It can also be used to communicate among agencies during an emergency situation, as needed. State agencies have been encouraged to procure equipment and participate in the net. Currently, eight agencies have done so. They are: 1. Department of Social and Health Services (DSHS). 2. Department of Agriculture . 3. Department of Community, Trade, and Economic Development (CTED) - Energy Division. 4. Department of Health (DOH). 5. Department of Information Services (DIS). 6. Department of Labor and Industries (L&I). 7. Department of Retirement Systems (DRS). 8. Office of the Governor. 9. Office of the State Auditor. 10. Utilities and Transportation Commission. 11. Employment Security Department. A talk group, primarily consisting of the state agencies, has been defined for the net. The State Emergency Operations Officer (SEOO) monitors the net on a 24- hour basis. Communications checks of the net are scheduled on the first and third Mondays of each month to ensure operational readiness. http://siec.wa.gov/plan/files/SCIP.pdf |
|
| Author: | Atomic Taco [ Tue Aug 04, 2009 7:16 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Monitoring WSDOT |
olowy wrote: Not enough interest? Who wouldnt want to listen to the Auditor's office or employment security dept? What he meant is that there are very few systems around the country that use this protocol. Any money spent on R&D would not significantly help sell scanners. Or in other words, it would fall on deaf ears. |
|
| Author: | olowy [ Tue Aug 04, 2009 8:41 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Monitoring WSDOT |
I was just kidding anyways. I think that old adage about climbing mountain becasue they are there would apply to scanners - if there is a radio system I will listen to it. Atomic Taco wrote: olowy wrote: Not enough interest? Who wouldnt want to listen to the Auditor's office or employment security dept? What he meant is that there are very few systems around the country that use this protocol. Any money spent on R&D would not significantly help sell scanners. Or in other words, it would fall on deaf ears. |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 8 hours |
| Copyright © 2013 Interceptradio.com |
|