InterceptRadio.com Forums

The radio website that doesn’t molest your screen with advertisements.
It is currently Thu Aug 07, 2025 4:59 am

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Forums       Map Search       Database Search       Live Audio       Alerts       Wiki




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 19 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Cell reception
PostPosted: Thu Jul 09, 2009 6:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2007 1:58 pm
Posts: 3430
Location: Not in Alaska
So an article in uweek just got published and forwarded to me via e-mail. They're putting up "towers" on a few buildings around campus. Right now the only antennas on campus are down at the UW Medical Center, somewhere on what's called the BB Tower. No idea what that is.

The article points out that any coverage currently available is from "bleed" (my word, not theirs) from the areas surrounding. A quick check on Cell Reception shows only two, but that's not surprising since there are a bunch mounted on the tops of buildings and they don't have to register those.

I seem to be one of the few people that gets coverage in every building. I get decent coverage in some basements too. My internal antenna probably is doing little to pull in weak signals. I'm also one of the only ones with Verizon. Seems most people are on AT&T or T-Mobile with a handful of Sprinties (no Nexthells).


So, just wondering, is there something special about CDMA and/or 800 (or 1900) that makes its coverage better compared to 1900 TDMA/GSM/GPRS? I'd assume that 800 has better penetration than 1900 does.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cell reception
PostPosted: Fri Jul 10, 2009 8:19 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2004 2:22 pm
Posts: 520
Location: Boulder, CO
I can't speak from a technical stand point on cellular but rather from experience.

CDMA does seem to get into more places and provide a larger coverage area but it's audio quality is often muffled compared to the GSM variations.

A recent study found Verizon's network to be the most stable. Meaning that it had the most consistent RSSI while the GSM networks would wobble from 3G, to 2G and back. The 3G networks though provides clear audio quality and higher data rates. :? It's all a wash to me. I like my AT&T. Even if their business practices are highly suspect.

_________________
I taste copper.
Comments, views, opinions - and trails of destruction - are my own.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cell reception
PostPosted: Fri Jul 10, 2009 4:38 pm 
Offline
Bringer of Light
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 5:22 pm
Posts: 1573
Location: Depends on the day of the week
Any ideas on how Sprint's new 4G network will work out? Palm Pre -- here I come!

_________________
Interoperability is an attitude, not a technology.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cell reception
PostPosted: Fri Jul 10, 2009 5:28 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 8:11 pm
Posts: 2151
Location: Puget Sound
Keep in mind... lower frequencies propagate better. Higher frequencies are more directional and are easier to attenuate.

800mHz needs fewer tower sites to cover the same area that 1.9gHz needs...

The b side cellular service (now Verizon) had a head start building their tower sites.

_________________
"A well regulated breakfast, being necessary to the healthy start of the day, the right of the people to keep and eat food shall not be infringed."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cell reception
PostPosted: Fri Jul 10, 2009 9:24 pm 
Offline
Scanner Gigolo

Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2004 2:23 pm
Posts: 2005
Location: User Unknown
The first 15 minutes of the GDGT podcast roundtable on the Palm Pre was about the IPhone....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cell reception
PostPosted: Sun Jul 12, 2009 11:23 pm 
Offline
Bringer of Light
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 5:22 pm
Posts: 1573
Location: Depends on the day of the week
Mark wrote:
The first 15 minutes of the GDGT podcast roundtable on the Palm Pre was about the IPhone....


That's what I'm afraid of. I just cant justify to myself paying the $30/month alone for the data plan for that damn thing...if Apple wasn't a bunch of douches, Sprint would have the iPhone by now and I'd be peachy...

_________________
Interoperability is an attitude, not a technology.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cell reception
PostPosted: Sun Jul 12, 2009 11:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2007 1:58 pm
Posts: 3430
Location: Not in Alaska
Apple first approached Verizon for the iPhone, but wanted to control too much of the process in which the customer acquires the phone. Since Verizon prides itself on its excellent customer service, they turned Apple down.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cell reception
PostPosted: Mon Jul 13, 2009 12:15 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2005 1:17 am
Posts: 2648
Location: Bellevue, WA
chpalmer wrote:
Keep in mind... lower frequencies propagate better. Higher frequencies are more directional and are easier to attenuate. 800mHz needs fewer tower sites to cover the same area that 1.9gHz needs...


Yup and this is why I'll never go back CDMA. GSM850 is almost mandatory around these parts due to the hills. Reception is better and the GSM audio quality is far superior.

I had Sprint for many years but their customer support was a joke. Also, their policy about giving "new" customers $250 off a brand new phone really pissed me off. So I've been a PAYING customer for 5 years but I have to stick with an inferior phone for 2 years. A new customer (with no previous history with Sprint) can buy their top of the line phone for $100 but I have to pay $350. That makes sense!

Don't get me started on their service termination agreements! :evil:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cell reception
PostPosted: Mon Jul 13, 2009 6:25 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2000 9:20 am
Posts: 2005
The iphone looked real cool until I saw how Apple wanted to be nazis over what software you put on your phone, plus the lack of a removable battery was kind of a joke. So I went with a HTC Touch Pro and Sprint service. It does everything an iphone can, has removable micro-SD storage, both a touchscreen and a keyboard, and a data plan is purely optional if wifi suits your needs. oh, and you can run the GPS software and maps locally without having to have a data plan and streaming the map data.

Why on earth people get iphones is beyond me. There is much better stuff out there.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cell reception
PostPosted: Mon Jul 13, 2009 6:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2007 1:58 pm
Posts: 3430
Location: Not in Alaska
Rich wrote:
Why on earth people get iphones is beyond me.

Because maybe you want to call your mom. Well, there's an app for that.
Maybe you need to split a check between two people and calculate a tip. There's an app for that too.
Or maybe you just want to charge the battery. Well, there's an app for that.


Oh crap, my phone from the turn of the century can do all that! And I hear you Rich--I'm in the exact same boat except with Verizon. But there are times when a data plan would come in handy. Not enough to justify $30 a month of $0.0015 a kilobyte.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cell reception
PostPosted: Mon Jul 13, 2009 4:46 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2007 7:46 pm
Posts: 777
Location: Portland, OR
Some of us can do all of that with a BlackBerry :P

_________________
Mt Wave SAR member
Support Search & Rescue: Get Lost!
http://www.mwave.org


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cell reception
PostPosted: Mon Jul 13, 2009 5:11 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2005 1:17 am
Posts: 2648
Location: Bellevue, WA
KE7JFF wrote:
Some of us can do all of that with a BlackBerry :P


...I could do this even BEFORE the iphone! :D


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cell reception
PostPosted: Mon Jul 13, 2009 7:52 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2007 7:46 pm
Posts: 777
Location: Portland, OR
nickcarr wrote:
KE7JFF wrote:
Some of us can do all of that with a BlackBerry :P


...I could do this even BEFORE the iphone! :D


Thats because you had your CDPD modem connected to your Newton :P

_________________
Mt Wave SAR member
Support Search & Rescue: Get Lost!
http://www.mwave.org


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cell reception
PostPosted: Mon Jul 13, 2009 8:31 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2005 1:17 am
Posts: 2648
Location: Bellevue, WA
haha, the only apple products i buy are of the fruit variety! 8)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cell reception
PostPosted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 3:47 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2004 3:49 pm
Posts: 60
Funny, it's true that other phones have done all that stuff for years, but if you look at the statistics showing which phones users are actually using their web browser and other IP applications, it ain't Palm or Blackberry.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 19 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by electricity. Copyright © 2013 Interceptradio.com