| InterceptRadio.com Forums http://interceptradio.com/bbs/ |
|
| milcom article in monitoring times http://interceptradio.com/bbs/viewtopic.php?f=26&t=2095 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | SpudGunMan [ Tue May 06, 2008 7:43 am ] |
| Post subject: | milcom article in monitoring times |
if you get monitoring times may has a thing on milcom for pacNW |
|
| Author: | Matt Cawby [ Tue May 06, 2008 11:28 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: milcom article in monitoring times |
Can you go back to the store where you read the magazine and get more details |
|
| Author: | SpudGunMan [ Tue May 06, 2008 5:08 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: milcom article in monitoring times |
what type of a response is that, why dont you go buy a copy. |
|
| Author: | Wilrobnson [ Tue May 06, 2008 7:03 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: milcom article in monitoring times |
Hey Matt, you wouldn't be interested, it's Chris Parris' report on the regional 380mhz DOD trunked system we were discussing the other day. |
|
| Author: | the Outlaw [ Tue May 06, 2008 11:55 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: milcom article in monitoring times |
Can I have those little add things that fall out..?.. |
|
| Author: | SpudGunMan [ Wed May 07, 2008 8:43 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: milcom article in monitoring times |
? this is a small time private mag, they dont really have adverts other then of radio's that grove sells. you looking for a subscription thing? they have a online store. |
|
| Author: | Mark [ Wed May 07, 2008 10:24 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: milcom article in monitoring times |
Did he just call my hobby "small time"? He must have meant QRP |
|
| Author: | FlashP [ Mon May 12, 2008 6:37 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: milcom article in monitoring times |
USN site 101 is still a puzzle. I have to agree with Chris that it isn't at Ft Lewis now; in fact on Saturday I don't think it was anywhere. I was driving all sorts of places, and not a peep, and no alternate found searching the band. Yesterday I was in the hills hiking, also nothing found. Yet this morning it's back, solid enough to use the attenuator. I also discovered that 385.0625 is also a wonderful intermod product - strong enough at times to generate Close Call hits. Got those and the signal stayed up long enough to listen and confirm intermod cutting in & out (sounded like a control channel and maybe digital voice, wouldn't decode). Given that, I'd treat any S-meter readings with suspicion unless the attenuator is ON. Flash |
|
| Author: | Wilrobnson [ Mon May 12, 2008 3:24 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: milcom article in monitoring times |
FlashP wrote: I have to agree with Chris that it isn't at Ft Lewis now; in fact on Saturday I don't think it was anywhere. I was driving all sorts of places, and not a peep, and no alternate found searching the band. Yesterday I was in the hills hiking, also nothing found. Yet this morning it's back, solid enough to use the attenuator. Flash I had no problem listening to it Saturday afternoon, between 1300-1630, from the area near McChord AFB. The east fill site was a little lower level than normal, but that's about it. FYI the USN stuff, my Ramsey DDF1 (Doppler Direction Finder Kit) is in the mail as we speak, so I'll take a weekend and fox hunt all this stuff soon enough. |
|
| Author: | FlashP [ Mon May 12, 2008 4:11 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: milcom article in monitoring times |
Clarification: I heard Army 101 (380ish) but not Navy 101 (385.0625). Let us know how the Doppler works... I've been tempted myself. Flash |
|
| Author: | Wilrobnson [ Mon May 12, 2008 6:09 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: milcom article in monitoring times |
FlashP wrote: Clarification: I heard Army 101 (380ish) but not Navy 101 (385.0625). Let us know how the Doppler works... I've been tempted myself. Flash Gotcha, I misread it. |
|
| Author: | SpudGunMan [ Wed May 14, 2008 6:39 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: milcom article in monitoring times |
Mark wrote: Did he just call my hobby "small time"? He must have meant QRP in reference to the "things that fall out" the mag is i would assume distribution in the xx,xxx and not owned by a major publisher thusly they dont have major marketing campaign for higher distribution. |
|
| Author: | Wilrobnson [ Mon May 19, 2008 6:37 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: milcom article in monitoring times |
FlashP wrote: Clarification: I heard Army 101 (380ish) but not Navy 101 (385.0625). Let us know how the Doppler works... I've been tempted myself. Flash It's going to be awhile, Flash. I got it today and am pretty intimidated by the kit. I don't even have a soldering iron... Learning is half the fun, but what's the other half? |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 8 hours |
| Copyright © 2013 Interceptradio.com |
|