KD7SMX wrote:
Certain WSP zones are still using mountain top remote base stations and haven't yet gone to a fully repeated system.
...(editing) If all zones keyed at once, without proper setup and equipment, you wouldn't be able to understand it through the noise it would create... (editing) When a troop identifies an area at the beginning of the transmission it's telling the dispatcher what zone she should reply to.
It's a good system for covering large areas. It's also why WSP dispatchers repeat a lot of what the troopers say in order to help the rest of the units know what was just said.
I'm always open for correction here, I haven't actually laid eyes on their system but this is how I understand it to work.
You're pretty much right on. We do run into occasional gaffes where a troop will give the wrong area, or the right one and the comm officer will key on another, but the system actually works pretty well.
Simulcast has been suggested. However, the necessary hardware to implement it is, apparently, not that cheap and there is also the increased risk of interference to adjacent channels and other services to consider.
The most popular future-proofing I've heard talked about to date is twofold: First, shifting to narrow-band operation. Second, shifting to VHF trunking.
There are no plans that I know of to abandon VHF operation. It just works too well in the terrain we've got.
Happy listening.
_________________
Bruce Lane, KC7GR
Owner, Blue Feather Technologies
Motorola programming and conversion service available. See
http://www.bluefeathertech.com/rf.html
"Salvadore Dali's computer has surreal ports..."