InterceptRadio.com Forums
http://interceptradio.com/bbs/

NCSO North
http://interceptradio.com/bbs/viewtopic.php?f=21&t=3846		 Page 1 of 2
Author:  Lucky Dog [ Tue Feb 09, 2010 5:28 pm ]
Post subject:  NCSO North
NCSO North Radio
Shots fired, air closed.

1725
Author:  Lucky Dog [ Tue Feb 09, 2010 5:36 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: NCSO North
Moved to Tac 02
1735

ICS set up.
Author:  Sean [ Tue Feb 09, 2010 5:46 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: NCSO North
I give. What department ?
Author:  SpudGunMan [ Tue Feb 09, 2010 8:48 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: NCSO North
im guessing typo on KCSO
Author:  OWEN62 [ Tue Feb 09, 2010 9:02 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: NCSO North
I must be missing something here I don't see talkgroup 1725 listed for King or Snohomish county. must be for somewhere, the op should learn to post what County they are posting about in the future.
Author:  Sean [ Tue Feb 09, 2010 9:17 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: NCSO North
I'm going with 1725 as the time.
Author:  Lucky Dog [ Tue Feb 09, 2010 10:17 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: NCSO North
Yes, KCSO North.

North around Skykomish, Old Stevens Pass Hwy sounded like. Standoff with shots fired.
Moved to Tac 02 with KC as lead agency, but very little radio activity.
Author:  OWEN62 [ Tue Feb 09, 2010 11:49 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: NCSO North
I am not trying to be a butthead here but tag 1725 does not come back to anything in King County as far as I can see. I must be missing something here ?
Author:  OWEN62 [ Wed Feb 10, 2010 12:01 am ]
Post subject:  Re: NCSO North
How about a control channel, you could of found something new, from what I can see this would be more in line with Port of Seattle Public Safety or Seattle Fire or Snohomish County Sheriff as far as a Tag of 1725 did you get this in a open mode or closed on your scanner? as the three Countys that I looked in this Tag does not come back to anyone.
Author:  N7QOR [ Wed Feb 10, 2010 12:28 am ]
Post subject:  Re: NCSO North
OWEN62 wrote:
I am not trying to be a butthead here but tag 1725 does not come back to anything in King County as far as I can see. I must be missing something here ?


1725 was the time he posted, not the TGID
Author:  OWEN62 [ Wed Feb 10, 2010 12:44 am ]
Post subject:  Re: NCSO North
N7QOR wrote:
OWEN62 wrote:
I am not trying to be a butthead here but tag 1725 does not come back to anything in King County as far as I can see. I must be missing something here ?


1725 was the time he posted, not the TGID

AH, his post was 1728, no need to post time as it shows up in your post, as you can see I am not the only one that did not knew what he was talking about. I need to read between the lines.
Author:  Lucky Dog [ Wed Feb 10, 2010 6:11 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: NCSO North
Yes, I would agree it was confusing. Was in the middle of something else when it came up and posted it too quickly.
Sorry for the confusion.

So queston: When someting is happening, how much detail should be taken off the air and posted?
Author:  OWEN62 [ Wed Feb 10, 2010 6:51 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: NCSO North
I would have to say talkgroup the county and just what it is that you hear, if it a officer safety thing then just keep the details to yourself. over the years here this has been well talked about and the owner does not want anything posted here that could compromise officer safety.
Author:  SpudGunMan [ Wed Feb 10, 2010 6:52 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: NCSO North
I think what you had is good just no Typo's that what made the mess... as for your time I wasn't confused since AFAIK no "vally com" or county system has a 1xxx TGID only Seattle and Port that I am aware of even use numbers like that

your likely going to get posts up the ying yang about this but I thought it was good.

I also think ford is superior vehicle to any other and Icom is a better radio sooo...
Author:  N7QOR [ Wed Feb 10, 2010 9:07 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: NCSO North
OK Spud, I agree on ICOM's, but I go for Chevy's
Page 1 of 2 All times are UTC - 8 hours
Copyright © 2013 Interceptradio.com