InterceptRadio.com Forums
http://interceptradio.com/bbs/

In an Emergency, Why Cellular Data Is Better Than Voice
http://interceptradio.com/bbs/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=4091
Page 1 of 1

Author:  Atomic Taco [ Mon Apr 12, 2010 12:42 pm ]
Post subject:  In an Emergency, Why Cellular Data Is Better Than Voice

http://crackberry.com/emergency-why-cel ... tter-voice

Some portions are a rip of Wikipedia.

Author:  chpalmer [ Mon Apr 12, 2010 4:57 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: In an Emergency, Why Cellular Data Is Better Than Voice

Major point is that the phone requires an acknowledgment when sending text data, ect. So the handset will keep trying if it doesn't get through. Voice does not work this way.

This can work in the mountains hiking or driving along Lake Cresent west of Port Angeles day to day where the coverage sucks.

Author:  jrw14493 [ Tue Apr 13, 2010 7:46 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: In an Emergency, Why Cellular Data Is Better Than Voice

I went to a seminar at an electronics show in Seattle (remember Sean?) and we learned that during the 9/11 attacks the NY 800 system was shit but the BlackBerry network remained operational and was used during and throughout the ordeal. Thought that was interesting.

Author:  the Outlaw [ Wed Apr 14, 2010 5:13 am ]
Post subject:  Re: In an Emergency, Why Cellular Data Is Better Than Voice

Data uses less bandwidth than voice.
On fringe areas where I haven't been able to get a voice call through, I've successfully sent text messages.

Author:  SpudGunMan [ Wed Apr 14, 2010 12:22 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: In an Emergency, Why Cellular Data Is Better Than Voice

also important to note that when your stuck somewhere its better to tweet then to simply SMS to one person that way we all know about it..

you could also post up to intercept emergency news from your Iphone or blackberry which is tweet v0.0.0.1

I tweeted about this post

tweet

Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC - 8 hours
Copyright © 2013 Interceptradio.com