Every so often someone finds the time to deposit a turd in the inbox. Here is the latest (and a response):
RON WALLER
n7sij@yahoo.com wrote:
> So i will assume that this site is garbage since it has not even come close to being correct for years and years ?
>
Dear Ron,
Intercept NW has more (regional) data, and quantitatively more accurate data, than any other site covering the area. Any site that claims otherwise has plagarized information from Intercept NW so their credibility is nil.
Intercept NW was the first site to offer a large-scale frequency database which included data such as PL tones, trunk systems, and trunk talkgroups. Many sites have followed in these footsteps as well.
It is also a non-profit site which means the hosting, programming, and work put into the content is for the promotion of the hobby, not the promotion of the webmasters pocketbook via splashing ads on your screen. The data is "owned" collectively by the contributors. Other large radio sites are full of legalisms claiming they own all the contributed data so they can resell it on CD.
And as with any site, it is at the mercy of those who contribute to it and when they are able to contribute. Likewise some data may be new, some may be old, and some might not change often and therefore does not need to be updated often.
I find it amusing that you characterize our site as "garbage".
Perhaps you can share with us your efforts and contributions to the hobby. Hopefully nobody will call it "garbage"...
Since many people have contributed to the site, I'll be sharing your letter on our forums so others may comment on your heartfelt feelings for our site.